Latest Updates

Shock

    • Early recognition of shock is difficult but essential for preservation of cellular and organ function and survival. The earliest clinical signs are nonspecific, with the initial inflammatory response including tachycardia, fevers, or cool or clammy skin. 
    • The approach to shock ultimately requires understanding and correcting its etiology (eg, antibiotics and source control for sepsis, thrombectomy after massive pulmonary embolus, hemorrhage control after trauma, and so forth). However, until these are diagnosed and addressed directly, clinicians ultimately have three approaches in their armamentarium: volume expansion, vasopressors, and cardioactive agents.
    • The PAC was introduced in 1970. Its use increased over the next 3 decades and eventually was considered the standard of care for most critically ill patients. However, the use of PACs declined rapidly after the results of the randomized, controlled trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealing no benefit in high-risk surgical patients.

Shock

    • Early recognition of shock is difficult but essential for preservation of cellular and organ function and survival. The earliest clinical signs are nonspecific, with the initial inflammatory response including tachycardia, fevers, or cool or clammy skin. 
    • The approach to shock ultimately requires understanding and correcting its etiology (eg, antibiotics and source control for sepsis, thrombectomy after massive pulmonary embolus, hemorrhage control after trauma, and so forth). However, until these are diagnosed and addressed directly, clinicians ultimately have three approaches in their armamentarium: volume expansion, vasopressors, and cardioactive agents.
    • The PAC was introduced in 1970. Its use increased over the next 3 decades and eventually was considered the standard of care for most critically ill patients. However, the use of PACs declined rapidly after the results of the randomized, controlled trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealing no benefit in high-risk surgical patients.

Shock

    • Early recognition of shock is difficult but essential for preservation of cellular and organ function and survival. The earliest clinical signs are nonspecific, with the initial inflammatory response including tachycardia, fevers, or cool or clammy skin. 
    • The approach to shock ultimately requires understanding and correcting its etiology (eg, antibiotics and source control for sepsis, thrombectomy after massive pulmonary embolus, hemorrhage control after trauma, and so forth). However, until these are diagnosed and addressed directly, clinicians ultimately have three approaches in their armamentarium: volume expansion, vasopressors, and cardioactive agents.
    • The PAC was introduced in 1970. Its use increased over the next 3 decades and eventually was considered the standard of care for most critically ill patients. However, the use of PACs declined rapidly after the results of the randomized, controlled trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealing no benefit in high-risk surgical patients.

Cardiac Arrhythmias, Acute Coronary Syndromes, and Heart Failure in the Surgical Patient

    • To recognize and treat important cardiac arrhythmias in the surgical patient using the latest advances
    • Most up to date guidelines in management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in Surgical Patients
    • Recent progress in management ofheart failure in postoperative and traumatic patients

Atrial Fibrillation

    • Latest available ACC/AHA guidelines and ongoing controversy around optimal heart rate targets
    • Updated classification for patients with valvular and nonvalvular AF algorithm for maintenance of sinus rhythm
    • 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS and 2020 ESC/EACTS practice guidelines delineated new and modified anticoagulation recommendations pertaining to NOACs.

Pacemaker Therapy

    • The number of permanent pacemakers implanted per year increased by 55.6% between 1993 and 2009, and is continuing to rise. Accordingly, the number of patients treated in the emergency department who have permanent pacemakers is increasing, and it is important for physicians in the emergency department to be familiar with the operation and potential complications of these devices.
    • Genetic testing of first-degree relatives is recommended according to 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines on evaluation of bradycardia and conduction delay.
    • Permanent pacing is reasonable intervention for patients with tachy-brady syndrome and symptoms attributable to bradycardia.
    • 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS specific guideline considerations for genetic disorders, neuromuscular disorders, and infiltrative disorders (e.g., cardiac sarcoidosis and amyloidosis).

Cardiac Arrhythmias, Acute Coronary Syndromes, and Heart Failure in the Surgical Patient

    • To recognize and treat important cardiac arrhythmias in the surgical patient using the latest advances
    • Most up to date guidelines in management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in Surgical Patients
    • Recent progress in management ofheart failure in postoperative and traumatic patients

Pacemaker Therapy

    • The number of permanent pacemakers implanted per year increased by 55.6% between 1993 and 2009, and is continuing to rise. Accordingly, the number of patients treated in the emergency department who have permanent pacemakers is increasing, and it is important for physicians in the emergency department to be familiar with the operation and potential complications of these devices.
    • Genetic testing of first-degree relatives is recommended according to 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines on evaluation of bradycardia and conduction delay.
    • Permanent pacing is reasonable intervention for patients with tachy-brady syndrome and symptoms attributable to bradycardia.
    • 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS specific guideline considerations for genetic disorders, neuromuscular disorders, and infiltrative disorders (e.g., cardiac sarcoidosis and amyloidosis).
| Next »
Updates per yearSpecialty updatesNumber of sections